Evidence of Trump’s fraud is everywhere | Jobs Recent

Picking Donald Trump’s worst week is a magician’s game—there are many to choose from, and compelling arguments for several—but because it encompasses so many aspects of Trump’s experience, the past few days are indicative.

On Saturday, the former president called for the United States Constitution to be “suspended[d]” in response to his lies about rigging the election in 2020. On Monday, he lied about what he had said and accused the media. On Tuesday, he was elected in the US Senate election in the former ruby ​​​​state of Georgia, losing to the Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock, completing the midterm cycle where the Democrats despised the example, due to the presence of the president and major interference. And then there are Trump’s problems with the law.

On Tuesday, a jury in Manhattan found the Trump Organization guilty of 17 counts, leading to tax fraud and including conspiracy and falsifying business records, all as part of a scheme to avoid paying taxes on the salaries of senior executives. On Wednesday, The Washington Post broke the news (shortly compared to other outlets) that an outside investigative team hired by Trump’s lawyers had uncovered some of the classified documents he took with him when he left office, these in a West Palm Beach storage facility.

Together, these two news items show the sweep of Trump’s lawlessness, from the mundane to the extraordinary. Business crimes are minor crimes. The only strange thing about this story is that it happens to involve the former president’s company. Meanwhile, in the case of the documents left behind, the evidence shows that he committed a crime that no one but the former president of the country can commit.

The revelation of the documents in the archive is the latest twist in the ongoing saga of Trump’s removal of public records from the White House. Although evidence that the former president had not followed security regulations emerged even before he left office, the case broke open in August with a mysterious search by the FBI at Mar-a-Lago. Not only did the agents release boxes full of documents that appear to have been misappropriated, but some of them were said to be extremely difficult, potentially important to national security.

The newly discovered documents were turned over to the FBI, which Post reports. The search appears to represent his legal team scrambling to ensure full compliance with the subpoena, under pressure from a federal judge. The teams also combed through other Trump sites to see if things turned up, according to the report The New York Times. The Post reports that the team “had a mixture of boxes, gifts, suits and clothes, among other things” – a sign of the chaos and indifference that Trump deals with, well, everything.

In practice, only a former president could have entered this situation. Many government employees have arranged or top-secret clearance (and overclassification of documents is a real problem), but if some federal employees are caught removing secret documents, it is clearly subject to sanctions. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump tried to insist that before leaving office, he used his presidential right to taint documents, although there is no evidence of this other than his word, as it is.

But although Mr. Trump relied on the reason for the release of the documents, it has little to do with the simple fact that Trump took the records of the American people, not his own – and some government employees who have removed such documents may not be able to say it. , as he has, that he owns the documents and wants the Department of Justice to return them. His taking of documents and handling them arbitrarily is a serious abuse of the trust placed in him as the president of the country.

If the historical document case is jaw-droppingly unusual, the Manhattan tax case is yawn-inducingly normal. The jury found that the Trump Organization gamed the tax system to try to avoid paying taxes on executive salaries: The company gave top employees free cars, apartments, and other perks but didn’t include them in their reported compensation. The violation is simple and straightforward — the kind of nickel-and-dime scam that happens all the time, because it’s easy to do and often goes undetected. If Trump hadn’t been president, his company’s fraud wouldn’t have been national news, and it wouldn’t have been noticed; his reputation drew new scrutiny to his business.

The former president himself was not charged or charged with fraud, although prosecutors argued in the trial that he was part of the scheme and approved certain parts of it. (Trump has denied wrongdoing and has vowed to appeal the verdict.) The Trump Organization was fined $1.6 million, a small amount compared to its income. Meanwhile, New York’s attorney general accused Mr. Trump of another fraud scheme in which he offered variable amounts on real estate, allegedly in an attempt to save tax dollars or reduce debt.

For now, though, the Manhattan verdict is symbolic—even if the symbols are politically motivated, as handled by Trump. And along with the newly compiled documents, they show that no transgression is too big—or too small—to test him.

Source link